Skip to main content

it is a man thing

God is a Father. That is not too popular a statement in these days of inclusivity and tolerance. Some people like to refer to the ultimate deity as she or perhaps the politcally correct "he/she." Personally, I refer to someone in the way they refer to themselves. It is somewhat arrogant to do anything else, I think. Yes, God's character includes both femininity and masculinity, but he consistently refers to himself as a Father, the masculine family figure, so there must be a reason for this because God makes no choices lightly or randomly.

A few days ago as I was washing the bathroom floor, the following thoughts hit me out of nowhere.

God portrays himself as a male authority figure because this relates to us in a particular way, especially in areas of identity and worth. Girls get their sense of value from their father and further on in life, they look to men to validate and protect them (I am referring to a healthy validation here). Men look to their fathers to instill life skills and encouragement and strength. Their best male friends are the ones who accept them as they are, provide companionship without condition, and give good advice and support in times of crisis. I am not negating the roles of mothers or females at all, in fact I hope that all women find their true places of authority and realms of influence instead of trying to usurp or replace those of men.

In every case, I believe that God as a strong male figure is meant to encourage the best in us, provide strength where we have weakness, and be our provider. Let God be who He says He is.

This is a photo of Dean's new bug zapper which graces our back yard; it provides outdoor comfort for us and discomfort for mosquitoes.

Comments

Terry said…
Matte,

This is one of your best posts. I particularly liked your comment that you refer to people the way they refer to themselves: a foundation of civility and respect.

Also, that's a beautiful bug zapper.

-ttj
jaclyn said…
great post Matte.
I agree completely :)
shane magee said…
not sure about this one matte. remember numbers 23:19. now i know the point there is about god's immutibility in comparison to people's fickleness but the point of god's gender is surely a secondary one too. also it is important to note that "father" is ONE of the ways god has chosen to reveal himself. he is also revealed as "son" (again masculine) and holy spirit (neither male nor female but personal - in fact in contradistinction to luke's view of the spirit as dynamic power (very masculine) in luke/acts, john's description of the spirit is VERY female (comforting, guiding, nurturing, teaching). the shekinah glory in the ot is traditionally seen as being feminine, as is the wisdom of god (see proverbs). god gives birth in job and is a mother in isaiah. even in creation male AND female are made in the image of god.

the only reason this is a big deal is not not not to make god into a womyn but rather to challenge the subordination and abuse of womyn by male hands, often witht he full support of the church behind it.

mmm.

i don't know. but there's something important here that needs challenged.

http://tinyurl.com/28qcsh
http://tinyurl.com/2flh6x

tell me what you think.
Matte Downey said…
I don't disagree with you Mr. magee, so I guess that means I agree. Your points are all valid and throw more light on the subject, so thanks for that. however, I will say that I do not believe we should formulate emphases in doctrines in reaction to abuses we see. Truth is greater than that and deserves a bigger platform. Jesus said he was the truth and he came as a man and I have no problem with that and don't need to find a text to balance out his masculinity. I embrace it. I also realise he came at a certain point in history and his interactions with men and women were ground-breaking for his time.

I am not a feminist, I will admit, I am a male AND female supporter. I get annoyed when people start to divide the human race down the lines of sex when God so clearly embodies both in himself. I totally agree with your observations that women are held to different standards in this society than men, especially regarding age and value through beauty, but honestly, I don't feel like a victim, and the biggest way to fight the lie is to live the truth. I know I am an attractive, interesting and sometimes even wise and powerful woman and that any female character on screen pales in comparison to the real thing.

Perhaps this is just a battle you are meant to fight (and not me) and I cheer you on in it. In the meantime, I will continue to speak of the image of God as Father for it has much meaning for me.
shane magee said…
i too speak of and to the father. i love the metaphor and find it personally resonant and powerful.

but

you say that you "do not believe we should formulate emphases in doctrines in reaction to abuses we see. Truth is greater than that and deserves a bigger platform." in contradistinction to that i believe pretty much the only way doctrine has ever been formulated over the history of the church is to negate a wrong emphasis elsewhere - we would never have had the reformation for example unless luther had so clearly seen sola fida, sola gracia, sola scriptura in romans (an emphasis paul definitely did not place there).

hermeneutics - or the interpretation of scripture - should always always be used to correct wrong emphases in the culture around us - especially church culture.

i accept that not everyone is called to fight the same battle - thank god - and i really appreciate your engaging with difficult issues matte and even putting up with my nonsense, ranting and particular brand of heresy! i'm glad you do not feel victimised living in a system (world and church) which is trying its damnedest to victimise you.

fly your flag boldly. blaze a trail for the young women around you. show them something of what it means that in christ there is no longer male nor female. in blazing that trail you will be an uncomfortable challenge to us men as well and i commend you in it.
Matte Downey said…
I hear you, Shane. I think we are scribbling in the same book, just perhaps not on the same page. Yes, hermeneutics can be used to correct wrong thinking in our skewed culture and I am happy we can do so, but I believe that is just one of its purposes and in my humble opinion, a secondary one. The first is to reveal the character of God and bring wholeness to our fractured souls.

Of course, we all speak out of the emphases and passions and particular gifts and callings we have, so you will probably hear the prophet in my writings (it is all about God revealing himself to man and drawing him close, you fool!) while I read the teacher in yours (scripture is given for correction and edification - read up on your church history and look at the original languages *patient sigh*).

thanks most of all for the razor-sharp encouraging words and directives. I respond with a YES, I will! Let the godly ranting continue for it challenges me to be more truthful and real.

Popular posts from this blog

the songs we sing

NOTE: I am going to make some pretty strong statements below, but understand that it is my way of taking an honest, hard look at my own worship experience and practice. My desire is not to be overly critical, but to open up dialogue by questioning things I have assumed were totally fine and appropriate. In other words, I am preaching to myself. Feel free to listen in.

---------------------

When I am in a church meeting during the singing time, I sometimes find myself silent, unable to get the words past my lips. At times I just need a moment of stillness, time to listen, but other times, the words make me pause because I don't know that I can sing them honestly or with integrity. This is a good thing. We should never mindlessly or heartlessly sing songs just because everyone else is. We should care deeply about what we say in our sung, communal worship.

At their best, songs sung by the gathered body of Christ call to life what is already in us: the hope, the truth, the longing, t…

theology from the margins: God of Hagar

Our contexts have major implications for how we live our lives and engage with our world, that much is obvious. However, we sometimes overlook how much they inform our concepts of God. For those of us occupying the central or dominant demographic in society, we often associate God with power and truth. As a result, our theology is characterized by confidence, certainty, and an expectation that others should be accommodating. For those of us living on the margins of society, our sense of belonging stranded in ambiguity, God is seen as an advocate for the powerless. Our theology leans more toward inclusivity, and we talk less about divine holiness and righteousness and more about a God who suffers. On the margins, the priority is merciful and just action, not correct beliefs. 
There are significant theological incongruences between Christians who occupy the mainstream segment of society and those who exist on the margins. The world of theology has been dominated by Western male thought…

the movement of humility

We live in a context of stratification where much of society is ordered into separate layers or castes. We are identified as upper class, middle class, or lower class. Our language reflects this up/down (superior/inferior) paradigm. We want to be at the top of the heap, climb the ladder of success, break through the glass ceiling, be king of the hill. This same kind of thinking seeps into our theology. When we talk about humility, we think mostly think in terms of lowering ourselves, willfully participating in downward mobility. This type of up/down language is certainly present in biblical texts (James 4:10 is one example), but I believe that the kind of humility we see in Jesus requires that we step outside of a strictly up/down paradigm. Instead of viewing humility as getting down low or stepping down a notch on the ladder of society, perhaps it is more helpful to think in terms of proximity and movement.

Jesuit theologian, James Keenan, notes that virtues and vices are not really…