Skip to main content

transformation 2

I have a new answer to the oft-asked, "How are you?" My response these days is: "I am in need of some transformation!" The thing about being in a learning environment is that you can come head to head with information that makes you uncomfortable. The question then is: Do I just do my homework or do I grapple with this information at a deeper and more personal level? I venture to say that if we are not up for transformation, then we are not up for study or learning.

The second paper I wrote this semester was for a class that dealt with hermeneutics and ecclesiology (discovering biblical meaning within the context of a faith community). We talked a lot about transformational discourse. I wrote many wonderful words on the topic, but when talking about transformation, watch out! It just might sneak up and bite you in the butt! At two points in this course, it did. Here are my 'Ouch!' moments.

1. We were assigned a reading from Thomas Aquinas, The Ten Articles to be exact. I had read them before and had not found them that interesting. A bit hard to follow, honestly, and cold and scientific. I like a bit more passion with my theology. But before I read Aquinas this time, I read an article by a guy named Candler who talked about Thomas and his work. Wow! This guy loved Aquinas and went on and on about the great stuff to be found in Thomas. Really? By the end of the article, I realised that I had been missing a lot of the gems in Aquinas due to my prejudice. I decided to change my stinky attitude, give Aquinas another chance, and read "Ten Articles" again with fresh eyes. Candler was right. There was a lot of warmth beneath the surface when I bothered to look for it.

I can tell when someone loves what they are reading or studying. They speak of it with passion, they engage with it at a personal level as well as at an intellectual level, they are able to be patient with its peculiarities, and because of this, the insights they discover are often rich and the questions they ask lead them to further discovery. Pride was what had stopped up my ears to Thomas' voice. Love was the amplifier that helped me to hear him more clearly.

2. The second time came for me during the second last class. Everyone was being asked to offer some point that had resonated with them in the course or something they had learned. I had my prepared paragraph before me, stocked with fine words about unity and its attractiveness, but while a classmate was speaking, a sort of veil was removed from my eyes. I saw that I was being offered the opportunity to pursue unity with this group of people. It was something much stronger than being friendly as classmates; it was an invitation to receive them into my life.

I balked slightly at the thought because I knew how difficult it would be to truly commune with people from so many different backgrounds and beliefs and with such varied personalities. I felt a bit naked, and I could sense my integrity being challenged. I wrote in my journal, “I am drawn to unity [and] can write wonderful words about it, but am I up for it? Engaging requires that I go over there and make a friend…instead of deciding that I am not ‘into it’ and it is ‘not my thing.’ It is costly to engage."

Yep. Transformation is expensive stuff. I can't study things like love and truth and unity in a sterile lab or through an objective research paper. I have to be willing to be the subject of the research. Introducing subjectivity means that I need to touch the truth that I am trying to learn.
Here are some quotes from my paper on how this applies to interacting with the Bible:

When I find myself getting frustrated with what I encounter in the scriptures, whether at the apparent lack of detail, the confusing multiplicity, or the vagueness of the language, then I need to step into that place of confession and humility again and let truth judge me instead of the other way around. If we think we have tamed truth, mastered truth, we are deceived.

The Bible invites the reader to jump into its pages and live with the characters and the words that can be found there in order to walk through her own life with greater wisdom and humility. It is a book that is meant to get a bit dirty as we drag it with us through the mucky mud of the pits and valleys that we come across and wade through the murky waters of uncertainty and doubt that swirl about our knees. This is not a holy book in the sense that we cannot touch it. It is a holy book because it can help us see holiness if we will make ourselves subject to its powerful story of love.

Happy transformation!

This is a photo of crab tree blossoms from our front yard in St-Lazare.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

what binds us together?

For the past few weeks, I have been reading a book by famed psychiatrist M. Scott Peck which chronicles his travels (together with his wife) through remote parts of the UK in search of prehistoric stones. The book is part travel journal, part spiritual musings, part psychology, and part personal anecdotes. A mixed bag, to be sure, and not always a winning combination. At one point, I considered putting the book aside, not finishing it, but then Peck started writing about community. He is no stranger to the concept. He has led hundreds of community-building workshops over the years, helped start a non-profit organisation dedicated to fostering community, and written a compelling book about the topic, one which greatly impacted me when I read it oh so long ago.[1]

In preparation for a course I am teaching next year, I have been doing quite a bit of study on unity and community. Once you start thinking about it, you see and hear evidence of it everywhere. (See my blog on the impact of b…

job hunting

I am on the hunt for a job. PhD in hand, I am a theologian for hire. The thing is, not a lot of places are hiring theologians these days, and if they are, they are usually looking for scholars with skills and experience outside my area of expertise. Today I found job opportunities for those knowledgeable in Religion, Race, and Colonialism, Philosophy and History of Religion, Islam and Society, Languages of Late Antiquity, Religion, Ethics, and Politics, and an ad for a Molecular Genetic Pathologist. Not one posting for a Dramatic Theologian with  a side order of Spirituality and a dash of Methodology.

I know, I know. My expectations are a bit unrealistic if I believe I will find an exact match for my particular skills. I know that job descriptions are wish lists to some extent, so no candidate is ever a perfect match. I also realize that one must adapt one's skill set according to the requirements of the job and be flexible. But there are so few jobs which come within ten or even…

building the church

Imagine two scenarios: 1) Give every person in the room a popsicle stick. Ask them to come together and put their sticks onto a table. Invariably, you end up with a random pile of sticks on a table. 2) Give every person in the room a popsicle stick. Show a picture of a popsicle stick bird feeder and ask people to come together and put their sticks on a table according to the picture. You will end up with the beginnings of a bird feeder on a table.

What is the difference between the two scenarios? In both, each person brought what they had and contributed it to the collective. However, in the first scenario, there were no guidelines, no plan, and no right or wrong way to pile the sticks. People came, placed their sticks on the table, and walked away. In the second scenario, people were given a plan to follow and as a result, something specific was built. Instead of walking away after they made their contribution, people huddled around the table to watch what was being built. Some were…