Skip to main content


For: The Institute of Contemporary And Emerging Worship Studies, St. Stephen's University, Essentials Green Online Worship Values Course with Dan Wilt

The topics this week have been accessibility and cultural relevance in my online course. Not two of my favourite concepts, I have to admit. I think I have just had these ideas crammed down my throat by leaders once too often in order to get me (and other artists) to mellow out or put us more within their comfort zone. Or I could be misrepresenting the leadership's motives; I have been known to do that, but I do believe there is at least some partial truth in it.

I am a pretty messy truth teller sometimes, this past week being a good case in point. I will see a hazy picture of a situation, grasp a partial wisdom, get a vague idea of where something is going, and then let the words fly without really ordering them into cohesive and accessible sentences. Yes, I need to develop my skills as a communicator, but I believe that truth and love are too valuable to let them sit around until I get my act totally together. As long as I have love at the core of it, I am content to grapple with messy methods of delivery. Either people will have ears to hear and eyes to see or they won't.

I look at the life of Jesus: he was welcoming and shocking all at the same time, but he shocked where we often try to comfort, and he comforted where we often try to challenge. The people on the fringe felt very comfortable with him, yet he shocked even his family with some of his strong words - demanding and uncompromising words. He invited and repelled: he exhibited great power to intervene in life and death situations, and yet, chose powerlessness when confronted with an opportunity to really make a big splash. Such a shocking man - hard to be ambivalent about him.

How many people are ambivalent about us and what we do in our faith community? Do people hang out with us or walk into a group setting and say, hey, "What is going on here? This is really different." Or do they feel so at home that they continue to live an unconfronted life. In trying to minimize the shock factor from outside to inside the church, I think we might be focusing on the wrong things. Instead of trendy music, modern language, and snacks (all of which we do, by the way), I believe that people should be shocked at the authority, the compassion, the faithfulness, the humility, the healing, the uncompromising call forward, and the love for the poor that is present in our lives. They should be shocked that we don't want to promote ourselves or be successful. They should be shocked that we want to touch them and want them to touch us. They should be shocked at the things we say and do.

But if they want to see Jesus, then they will be comforted. They will be drawn to the truth. And they will never be the same.

This is a street on the plateau of Montreal.


Heather said…
Yes! Yes! I have struggled so much with accessibility and relevance...I feel like we look to culture and people around us and let those preferences, etc. dictate how we do "church." But I don't necessarily WANT to make people comfortable. Jesus really stirred the pot sometimes. I think the people that have the most hang ups are the ones already religious that get offended by things not being comfortable...

Anyway...I appreciate also how you are willing to risk being messy instead of waiting until you have the words perfectly in order and lost the moment.

You have inspired me through blue, red and now green with your down-to-earth, fully human approach to life. It's a blessing to have known you in essentials. Look forward to reading/watching more of your stuff.
Shelley said…
I agree...and we can't and shouldn't obsess about this.

that being said,
my thing with accessibility is the issue of respect, can I respect my audience enough to adjust my style so that you can get it? and by that I don't mean changing my message one iota. (we get 'into the weeds' when we think we need to change the message itself to be accessible and relevant.)
For example, in our church we want to welcome the marginalized and rejected of society, but I sometimes wonder if our service format is even workable for the restless, the broken, even the mentally challenged. am I humble enough to do it a bit differently so that more can hear and join?

I work with special needs kids, and it is very common to hear how they should be included, but very uncommon to find those who are willing to adjust their own style and expectations to make that possible.
Shelley said…
I love the picture, btw...imagine having the guts to paint your whole house bright red!! awesome. :)

Popular posts from this blog

what binds us together?

For the past few weeks, I have been reading a book by famed psychiatrist M. Scott Peck which chronicles his travels (together with his wife) through remote parts of the UK in search of prehistoric stones. The book is part travel journal, part spiritual musings, part psychology, and part personal anecdotes. A mixed bag, to be sure, and not always a winning combination. At one point, I considered putting the book aside, not finishing it, but then Peck started writing about community. He is no stranger to the concept. He has led hundreds of community-building workshops over the years, helped start a non-profit organisation dedicated to fostering community, and written a compelling book about the topic, one which greatly impacted me when I read it oh so long ago.[1]

In preparation for a course I am teaching next year, I have been doing quite a bit of study on unity and community. Once you start thinking about it, you see and hear evidence of it everywhere. (See my blog on the impact of b…

job hunting

I am on the hunt for a job. PhD in hand, I am a theologian for hire. The thing is, not a lot of places are hiring theologians these days, and if they are, they are usually looking for scholars with skills and experience outside my area of expertise. Today I found job opportunities for those knowledgeable in Religion, Race, and Colonialism, Philosophy and History of Religion, Islam and Society, Languages of Late Antiquity, Religion, Ethics, and Politics, and an ad for a Molecular Genetic Pathologist. Not one posting for a Dramatic Theologian with  a side order of Spirituality and a dash of Methodology.

I know, I know. My expectations are a bit unrealistic if I believe I will find an exact match for my particular skills. I know that job descriptions are wish lists to some extent, so no candidate is ever a perfect match. I also realize that one must adapt one's skill set according to the requirements of the job and be flexible. But there are so few jobs which come within ten or even…

building the church

Imagine two scenarios: 1) Give every person in the room a popsicle stick. Ask them to come together and put their sticks onto a table. Invariably, you end up with a random pile of sticks on a table. 2) Give every person in the room a popsicle stick. Show a picture of a popsicle stick bird feeder and ask people to come together and put their sticks on a table according to the picture. You will end up with the beginnings of a bird feeder on a table.

What is the difference between the two scenarios? In both, each person brought what they had and contributed it to the collective. However, in the first scenario, there were no guidelines, no plan, and no right or wrong way to pile the sticks. People came, placed their sticks on the table, and walked away. In the second scenario, people were given a plan to follow and as a result, something specific was built. Instead of walking away after they made their contribution, people huddled around the table to watch what was being built. Some were…