Skip to main content

eating with monastics


This past weekend I was on a winter retreat with my faith community.  There were 21 of us stuffed into a 4-bedroom chalet in the mountains.  It was amazing to see how gracious and patient people were with each other.  One person volunteered to sleep in the laundry room.  Others offered to help out in the kitchen even if they were not scheduled to assist with cooking or cleaning.  Our hosts welcomed us with huge smiles, hugs, and kisses.  They silently served us in many ways: not only did they let us take over their chalet, but after a snowy night, we awoke to find that our cars had all been brushed off, ready for the trip home. I don't remember hearing any complaints over the weekend.  We cooked together, we ate together, we went on a winter hike, we frolicked on the frozen lake, we drank tea by the fire, we played games, we had times of silence, we worshipped God together, and we prayed for each other. 

Our last meal together was a variation of a monk meal.  In a monastic community, meals are eaten in silence.  Many times, someone reads an inspirational text while the group eats.  One also has to be attentive to the needs of others, making sure that everyone has access to food and drink.  The goal of the monastic meal is to help us to focus not just on our bodily needs, but to be attentive to nourishing our spirits and to be mindful of the needs of others around us.  There are a few things that I notice every time I participate in a monk meal.

First, the noise of serving and eating a meal always surprises me.  A monk meal is never truly silent.  Today, I was thinking about music played in restaurants.  I suppose that aside from creating a certain ambiance, it is meant to diminish the voices of people around you so that you feel you have some privacy.  Maybe it is also meant to camouflage the noise of eating.  Perhaps it mostly reveals how unsettling we find silence and what it might require of us. 

Second, participating in a monk meal always makes me realize how far we fall short of selfless service and devotion.  Meals have become very much about our own needs, our own consumption.  How does one eat a meal to the glory of God?  I don't exactly know, but I think the monk meal can give us some clues as to how we can re-prioritize our meal times to reflect our devotion to God, and with much more than a token prayer of thanks tossed in at the beginning.

Third, I always come away with a sense that I need to learn to listen better.  I find it difficult to listen to someone read while I am eating.  I suppose that is why I volunteer to do much of the reading when we have a monk meal.  This last weekend, I read an article entitled, "The 7 Habits of People Who Place Radical Trust in God."  To me, this article echoes much of what the monk meal is about:  to help us get more in sync with the kingdom of God and less entangled in the values of our current culture.  The 7 habits, according to Jennifer Fulwiler, are:  1) They accept suffering, 2) They accept the inevitability of death, 3) They have daily appointments with God, 4) In prayer, they listen more than they talk, 5) They limit distractions, 6) They submit their discernment to others, and 7) They offer the Lord their complete, unhesitating obedience.  You can read the whole article by Jennifer Fulwiler here

The word monk comes from the root monos which simply means "single."  While in most cases it denotes an unmarried life, it also implies a single-minded devotion to Christ and Christ's community.  Yes, let my devotion be single.  And let me embrace the discipline of listening today.  Speak Lord, I am listening.

the photo:  some of our group at the lookout point of Mont Sourire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

the songs we sing

NOTE: I am going to make some pretty strong statements below, but understand that it is my way of taking an honest, hard look at my own worship experience and practice. My desire is not to be overly critical, but to open up dialogue by questioning things I have assumed were totally fine and appropriate. In other words, I am preaching to myself. Feel free to listen in.

---------------------

When I am in a church meeting during the singing time, I sometimes find myself silent, unable to get the words past my lips. At times I just need a moment of stillness, time to listen, but other times, the words make me pause because I don't know that I can sing them honestly or with integrity. This is a good thing. We should never mindlessly or heartlessly sing songs just because everyone else is. We should care deeply about what we say in our sung, communal worship.

At their best, songs sung by the gathered body of Christ call to life what is already in us: the hope, the truth, the longing, t…

theology from the margins: God of Hagar

Our contexts have major implications for how we live our lives and engage with our world, that much is obvious. However, we sometimes overlook how much they inform our concepts of God. For those of us occupying the central or dominant demographic in society, we often associate God with power and truth. As a result, our theology is characterized by confidence, certainty, and an expectation that others should be accommodating. For those of us living on the margins of society, our sense of belonging stranded in ambiguity, God is seen as an advocate for the powerless. Our theology leans more toward inclusivity, and we talk less about divine holiness and righteousness and more about a God who suffers. On the margins, the priority is merciful and just action, not correct beliefs. 
There are significant theological incongruences between Christians who occupy the mainstream segment of society and those who exist on the margins. The world of theology has been dominated by Western male thought…

the movement of humility

We live in a context of stratification where much of society is ordered into separate layers or castes. We are identified as upper class, middle class, or lower class. Our language reflects this up/down (superior/inferior) paradigm. We want to be at the top of the heap, climb the ladder of success, break through the glass ceiling, be king of the hill. This same kind of thinking seeps into our theology. When we talk about humility, we think mostly think in terms of lowering ourselves, willfully participating in downward mobility. This type of up/down language is certainly present in biblical texts (James 4:10 is one example), but I believe that the kind of humility we see in Jesus requires that we step outside of a strictly up/down paradigm. Instead of viewing humility as getting down low or stepping down a notch on the ladder of society, perhaps it is more helpful to think in terms of proximity and movement.

Jesuit theologian, James Keenan, notes that virtues and vices are not really…