Skip to main content

accurate worship


I was reading an introduction to 1-2 Chronicles a few days ago and came across an interesting phrase:  accurate worship.  It seemed strangely out of place, yet I know Eugene (Peterson) meant to use exactly those words.  So I did some thinking and reading and researching.  Here are some thoughts that came out of that.

First, let's look at the word 'accurate.'  I consulted with a few people who are well-versed in archery and came away with some good pointers on accuracy.  First, orient yourself towards your target.  Never let it out of your sight.  Second, anchoring is very important.  Be firmly grounded (solid stance) and find a point of reference which will help you to be consistent.  Some people draw the bow back till it touches their cheek.  Every time they aim, they then pull to the exact same spot -it helps them be consistent.  This is called anchoring.  Third, use a soft grip.  Too much tension on the bow or too much tension in your body will pull you off target.  A death grip on the bow (happens when you are trying really hard to get it right) makes your muscles contract and affects your accuracy.  Hold the bow lightly, with a partially open hand, allowing it to rest naturally between two fingers.  Be at ease. 

Now a few words about 'worship.'  Ronald Rolheiser talks about fire, desire, restlessness, longing, dissatisfaction, or an ache that each of us carry inside.  This is the impetus for human beings to reach beyond what they know.  What we do with this desire, Rolheiser says, is our spirituality.  I would say that it could also refer to our worship.  Rolheiser insists that all of us have a spirituality; we all do something with our longing for something greater than ourselves.  I believe the same applies to worship: we are all worshippers. We all direct our life-energy somewhere.  

When talking about accurate worship, there are two questions:  1) who or what are we worshipping (what is the target)? and 2) how well do we worship (how accurate are we)?  If you know anything about the nation of Israel in the Old Testament, you know that they loved to worship.  Most of the time, though, it was a bit of a shotgun/haphazard approach: they worshipped Jehovah but added in popular gods from the surrounding nations.  Their worship was also known to include a wide variety of practices; they started with the directives from Moses and picked up a few other additional rituals along the way like temple prostitution (everybody was doing it).  They added and dropped targets and changed practices at whim.  It was worship, but it wasn't very accurate.  God had given specific instructions to the people, letting them know what it looked like to be connected to him, to be in a covenant with Jehovah.  Covenants need to be accurate and explicit in order to protect the sanctity of the relationship and by inference, both parties.  Accuracy matters in these things.

Accurate worship, then, means that we choose only one target (Kierkegaard talks about willing 'one thing').  It means that we keep our eyes on that target and orient ourselves towards that target.  It implies that we find some anchoring points and practice in order to become consistent.  It requires that we find stability, yet not rigidity. 

Rolheiser suggest 4 essentials for a healthy spiritual life (and I would add, for accurate worship):  1) private prayer and private morality (Jesus knew the value of a strong, private relationship with God which resulted in choosing what God chose), 2) social justice (compassion for others), 3) mellowness of heart and spirit (not being a worrier, not quick to anger, but exhibiting thankfulness and graciousness), and 4) community as a constitutive element of true worship (being committed to a group of people not only keeps us anchored, it keeps us real).  I think those are pretty good places to start helping us focus our worship and develop some consistency. 

We are all going to worship today.  Who or what will it be?  How accurate will it be?

the photo:  outdoor ribbon installation I saw downtown this summer, with a few photo adjustments

Sources:
Ronald Rolheiser.  The Holy Longing: The Search for a  Christian Spirituality.  Doubleday, 1999.
Eugene Peterson.  Introduction to 1-2 Chronicles in The Message.  NavPress, 2004.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"If you know anything about the nation of Israel in the Old Testament, you know that they loved to worship. Most of the time, though, it was a bit of a shotgun/haphazard approach: they worshipped Jehovah but added in popular gods from the surrounding nations. Their worship was also known to include a wide variety of practices; they started with the directives from Moses and picked up a few other additional rituals along the way like temple prostitution (everybody was doing it). They added and dropped targets and changed practices at whim. It was worship, but it wasn't very accurate. God had given specific instructions to the people, letting them know what it looked like to be connected to him, to be in a covenant with Jehovah."

Yes, let's look at the word "accurate," particularly as "conformity to truth."

If you know anything about the people of Israel, you know that they were pantheists until after the Babylonian exile, at which point they became more-or-less exclusively monotheists.

If you know anything about the Old Testament, you know that the historical/archeological evidence supporting an actual person "Moses" and "wandering around in the desert" is next-to-none.

There isn't much accuracy in your interpretation of the Old Testament, unless we understand the Bible to be a document that should be taken at face-value (in which case as a woman you should be silent).

For an edutainment approach to biblical archeology and the Old Testament see Nova's 'The Bible's Buried Secrets'.

Regarding Rolheiser's suggestions:

"1) private prayer and private morality (Jesus knew the value of a strong, private relationship with God which resulted in choosing what God chose), 2) social justice (compassion for others), 3) mellowness of heart and spirit (not being a worrier, not quick to anger, but exhibiting thankfulness and graciousness), and 4) community as a constitutive element of true worship (being committed to a group of people not only keeps us anchored, it keeps us real)."

1. The Son of Man unified public and private morality, he came to fulfill the law (public morality) not destroy it. Our notion of a "private relationship with God" is a cultural construction that does not exist in scripture. The cult of this "private relationship" has come to define "spirituality," which has become a useless practice that encourages the oppression of the supplicant, instead of the liberation of the believer. This is a lie of the Antichrist. It is not a coincidence that this kind of spirituality is easy to commodify and sell to consumers.

3. The myth of the "kind & gentle spirit," combined with the lie of the "personal relationship" are used to oppress. If you ACCURATELY examine the lives of modern figures who have actually followed Jesus (and are not just 'fans' of a make-believe friend they have a personal relationship with) you will find that they are plenty spiritual, and plenty pissed-off: Martin Luther King Jr. comes to mind. The so-called "Christian" community is determined to promulgate the notion that such leaders are kind, gentle, and do not question authority. This is another lie of the Antichrist.

2 & 4. The Son of Man spoke of social justice and community as the only forms of spirituality. This is the essence of the Logos: the power of truth that emerges between people in wise discussion, a force with transformative powers that we can not know on our own, a power that must speak truth in order to be legitimate.

Popular posts from this blog

what binds us together?

For the past few weeks, I have been reading a book by famed psychiatrist M. Scott Peck which chronicles his travels (together with his wife) through remote parts of the UK in search of prehistoric stones. The book is part travel journal, part spiritual musings, part psychology, and part personal anecdotes. A mixed bag, to be sure, and not always a winning combination. At one point, I considered putting the book aside, not finishing it, but then Peck started writing about community. He is no stranger to the concept. He has led hundreds of community-building workshops over the years, helped start a non-profit organisation dedicated to fostering community, and written a compelling book about the topic, one which greatly impacted me when I read it oh so long ago.[1]

In preparation for a course I am teaching next year, I have been doing quite a bit of study on unity and community. Once you start thinking about it, you see and hear evidence of it everywhere. (See my blog on the impact of b…

job hunting

I am on the hunt for a job. PhD in hand, I am a theologian for hire. The thing is, not a lot of places are hiring theologians these days, and if they are, they are usually looking for scholars with skills and experience outside my area of expertise. Today I found job opportunities for those knowledgeable in Religion, Race, and Colonialism, Philosophy and History of Religion, Islam and Society, Languages of Late Antiquity, Religion, Ethics, and Politics, and an ad for a Molecular Genetic Pathologist. Not one posting for a Dramatic Theologian with  a side order of Spirituality and a dash of Methodology.

I know, I know. My expectations are a bit unrealistic if I believe I will find an exact match for my particular skills. I know that job descriptions are wish lists to some extent, so no candidate is ever a perfect match. I also realize that one must adapt one's skill set according to the requirements of the job and be flexible. But there are so few jobs which come within ten or even…

lessons from a theological memoir and a television series about lawyers

It's a hot Wednesday afternoon, so let's talk about false binaries. Basically, a false binary or false dichotomy happens when a person's options are artificially limited to two choices, thereby excluding all other possibilities. Insisting on the limited choice of either A or B leaves no room for middle ground or another, more creative solution. In other words, a false binary assumes the rest of the alphabet (after A and B) does not exist.

Binary thinking is quite prevalent in our society. Either you are for me or against me. Either you are guilty or innocent. Either you are a Democrat or a Republican, conservative or liberal. Either you are a Christian or a pagan. Either you are all in or all out. Admittedly, it is convenient to see things as either black or white, but we live in a multi-coloured world and not everything fits neatly into two categories. This is why insisting there are only two choices when, in fact, other options exist, is labeled as a fallacy in logic an…