Skip to main content

John 3:16 : a fresh look


In John 3, we find two of the most popular concepts in evangelicalism: the idea of being born again and the famous verse 16 which anyone brought up in Sunday School can recite at will. I wrote about the idea of being born again here if you want to check it out. In this post, I take a fresh look at John 3:16. The context for the two is the same. Jesus has just cleared the temple of money changers and many people have witnessed the signs he performed in Jerusalem during the Passover festival. In other words, he has gone public in a big way. This causes a religious leader, a well-known, socially and politically involved member of the Jewish ruling council, to approach Jesus privately at night. He wants to know what Jesus has that he is missing.

Before the man can pose a proper question, Jesus confronts him with the idea of spiritual rebirth, of having to start again like a vulnerable and helpless baby in order to enter into Jesus' world, the kingdom of God. Jesus then rebukes the religious teacher for not knowing much about heavenly things (the things of God), references an ancient story of rescue through the raising up of a bronze snake (Numbers 21), and then says these words which have become somewhat synonymous with the gospel: "God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him won't perish but will have eternal life."

But let's not stop there. Let's continue to the end of the conversation. "God didn't send his Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him. Whoever believes in him isn't judged; whoever doesn't believe in him is already judged, because they don't believe in the name of God's only Son. This is the basis for judgment: The light came into the world, and people loved darkness more than the light, for their actions are evil. All who do wicked things hate the light and don't come to the light for fear that their actions will be exposed to the light. Whoever does the truth comes to the light so that it can be seen that their actions were done in God" (John 3:16-21, Common English Bible).

Let's notice a few things about the text. The word pictures include a snake of healing and the idea of being lifted up. Some of the contrasts featured are earthly/heavenly, judging/saving, light/dark, and exposure/hiding. The themes of seeing, knowing, and trusting are related to being rescued and saved. The object of love and salvation is the world. 

How does this passage relate to being born again/anew/from above? Basically, it appears that Jesus is tying together the idea of new birth (starting anew and becoming vulnerable) to the picture of a loving and self-sacrificing father. In addition, Jesus is showing the religious leader how to see or recognize the kingdom of God. It looks like paternal love which is broad and inclusive. It looks like an invitation to participate in fullness and flourishing. It looks like transparency and humility (not coming in secret at night, perhaps?). It looks like rescue and not judgment. It looks like doing the truth. One can almost hear Jesus asking an unspoken question at the end of this conversation: "Can you see it now, my friend?" 

Keeping the arc of the conversation in mind, let's take a closer look at verse 16. Martin Luther referred to this verse as "the heart of the Bible, the Gospel in miniature." And that is mostly how it has been used by evangelicals. In the evangelism tool known as The Four Spiritual Laws, the first "law" states, "God loves you and created you to know Him personally" and references John 3:16.[1] The reference has also been used as a way to draw attention to the Christian message at public and sporting events. From the late 70s onward, it was not uncommon to see someone holding up a sign that said "John 3:16" in arenas and stadiums. In many ways, this verse has functioned as a shortcut for the gospel, but might this also have diluted or distorted the message in the process?

Let's recalibrate a bit by paying attention to the meanings of the words in the text. 

1. "God so loved the world' is not a statement of quantity (so very much) but a reference to how God enacted love. God loved the world in this way... The first reading puts the focus on us and how much we are valued. The second, more accurate reading places the attention on the giving nature of God and God's love which is boundless, selfless, and gracious.

2. The world (kosmos) is the focus of God's love. The emphasis is not on personal salvation but on the redemption of all creation.

3. To believe (pisteuo) means to trust in and rely on, not merely give mental assent to or recite a creed.

4. "Eternal life" is not about going to heaven when we die, but an invitation to experience flourishing, shalom, and justice by participating in the life of Christ. "This is eternal life: to know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you sent" (John 17:3, CEB). N. T. Wright translates this verse by saying that God gave his son "so that everyone who believes in him should not be lost but should share in the life of God's new age." [2]

5. To judge/condemn (krino) means to separate, to make a distinction between, to call to account, to try as a judge, to bring to trial, to sentence. The idea of separation is in contrast to knowing and trusting God. 

6. To be saved (sozo) means to be rescued, cured, restored to health, set free, saved from ruin. The reference to the healing of the people of Israel from a plague of poisonous snakes gives us a clue that salvation pertains to much more than the afterlife.

7. Light (phos) means radiance, means of light, God's presence, spiritual illumination, brightness.

8. Darkness (skotos) means misery, spiritual darkness, punishment.

So, what is John 3:16 saying? It is more than a concise way to tell people they need to accept Jesus as their personal saviour (remember, it's not about personal salvation). Jesus is saying that the new paradigm, being born anew, seeing God's kingdom, is possible because of God's love for the cosmos. 

Our familiarity with John 3:16 means that we can be prone to forget the context, the conversation it came out of, the original audience, and the startling rebuke and astounding invitation it was and is for religious leaders. 

Reading familiar biblical texts in different translations and paraphrases is helpful because it invites us to hear the words with fresh ears and put our preconceived notions aside. Often, a fresh reading will highlight connections and insights we had previously missed. With that in mind, I offer my own paraphrase of this familiar passage from John 3, incorporating many of the ideas mentioned above.

God loved the whole world in this way: selflessly giving his only son so that all those who trust in and rely on him won't be lost or ruined but will share in the life of God's new paradigm. God didn't send his son, his emissary, his very self, into the whole world to put the cosmos on trial, but in order that the whole world might be saved from ruin and restored to health through him. 

And that is really good news (gospel).

------------

1. http://www.4laws.com/laws/englishkgp/default.htm

2. New Testament for Everyone translated by N. T. Wright. Westminster John Knox Press, 2011. 

Image from cracked.com


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Names of God

The Hebrew word "YHWH" (read from right to left) This past Sunday I gave a talk on the Names of God, the beginning of a series on this topic. This first talk was to be a gentle introduction so I thought it wouldn't take too many hours of preparation. Well, I quickly discovered that the research is almost bottomless; every time I thought I had a somewhat definitive list of names, I found another source which added a few more or gave a different twist on some of the names I had already come across. After several hours I was getting overwhelmed by the sheer amount of data (and that was only looking at the Hebrew Bible). I wondered how I could present this to people in an orderly and accessible fashion and within a reasonable time frame. Not everyone is up for a 3-hour lecture crammed full of detail on a Sunday morning. So I took a break and spent a bit of time meditating on this problem and asking the Spirit for guidance. And then I thought that being overwhelmed by Go...

Esther's protest

I have been hesitant to write anything here pertaining to the student protests in Montreal, partly because I didn't believe I had any solutions to offer and partly because I just wanted to stay out of the controversial mess it has become.  Besides, I have studying to do.  But this weekend, something changed.  I read the book of Esther. First, some background:  the unrest started early in the year when a group of students decided to protest the tuition hikes proposed by the Quebec government ($325 a year for the next 5 years).  Seeing that tuition rates have been frozen for almost ten years, it seemed reasonable to the government to increase them to reflect rising costs.  This did not sit well with some students, and they organised an ongoing protest in which students were encouraged to boycott classes and refuse to hand in assignments.  It has now grown into a movement which has staged several organise...

it's a mad mad mad world (of theology)

The mad dash for the end of term has begun.  I have finished all my required readings and have jumped into research reading.  One of my papers is on the madness of theology (the correlation seems more obvious to some of us than to others).  Truly inspiring stuff, I am finding.  Let me share a few quotes here: There is a certain madness in Christianity – in a desert God who is jealous and passionate, in a saviour who speaks in apocalyptic terms, in a life of sacrificial love, in the scandal of particularity.   In principle, a confessional theology should bear the mark of this madness, but the mark or wound must constantly be renewed. - Walter Lowe, "Postmodern Theology" in The Oxford Handbook of Systematic Theology , 2007.   “In the Scriptures the odd phenomena constituting the ‘Kingdom of God’ are the offspring of the shock that is delivered by the name of God to what is there called the ‘world,’ resulting in what I call a ‘sacred anarchy.’   C...