Skip to main content

patriarchy and the Bible

Related image

The Hebrew Bible, also known as the Old Testament, sometimes gets a bad rap. So much violence, so many harsh judgments and prophecies, so much bad behaviour, so much patriarchy. At first glance, it seems to paint a rather unattractive picture not only of the people of God but of God himself. But if we look a little closer, we find that things are not always as they seem. Take patriarchy, for example.

Patriarchy is a societal and familial system in which the father and the eldest male are the authority figures. The first-born son dominates the family in power, wealth, and privilege. It is a system very unfriendly to women and anyone not lucky enough to be the firstborn male. And this objectionable, unjust system seems to lie at the very foundation of Judaism and Christianity. What is one to do with those pesky patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?

The first thing we can do is note that while patriarchy is the context of the story of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, it is not the message. Sacred texts tell us about God, but they also tell us about the world at the time, and we need to learn to discern the difference between the two. Just because the Bible tells us about an ancient world dominated by patriarchy and violence does not mean that these practices have divine endorsement. Very often the biblical writers present their cultural context as a contrast to the nature of God. If we are not attentive to that context, we can miss these nuances.

Second, when reading stories in the Bible we should observe when and where they deviate from the cultural norm of the time. These departures are often clues as to what the writer is trying to say about the nature of God. These breaks in societal and religious mores are meant to startle the reader, to alert them to the movement of God in history, a movement which shifts people in the direction of justice, mercy, and love. We quite readily notice this in the life and ministry of Jesus. Jesus did not choose his disciples from the brightest students at the synagogue but called a collection of misfits to follow him. Jesus did not view women as property but interacted with them as valued persons and trusted disciples. Jesus crossed social caste lines, treating lepers with more deference than religious leaders.

So what does this mean when we read about patriarchy in the Bible? Hebrew scholar Robert Alter draws attention to an interesting pattern of upset evident in the stories of the people of Israel. In the patriarchal system, the firstborn son is the heir, the privileged one, the blessed one, so one would expect to see this played out in the history of Israel. But time and again, the firstborn son is not the one chosen, not the one who receives the blessing, not the one who ends up carrying on the family legacy. Isaac was not the firstborn; it was Ishmael. Jacob was not the firstborn; that was Esau. Joseph was not the firstborn; it was Reuben, and yet Joseph's sons, Ephraim and Manessah, were given status in the twelve tribes of Israel. Ephraim was not the firstborn; it was Manasseh, and yet Ephraim received Jacob's blessing to be "a fullness of nations." (Genesis 48). Judah was not the firstborn, yet his name is referenced in a messianic title (Lion of Judah). David was not the firstborn, nor was Solomon, and yet these two great kings of Israel played significant roles in the nation's development and became progenitors to the Messiah.

It seems that the story of the nation of Israel might actually be a critique of patriarchy. In a family tree, one might expect an aberration or two, a straying from norms here and there, but the pattern of patriarchal upset in the nation of Israel is undeniable. Over and over again the biblical stories stand in stark contrast to the cultural practices of the time, and we as readers are asked to take note. I believe that the biblical text does not condone patriarchy; it critiques it and dismantles it. Who is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob? This is the God who chooses those overlooked by the system, who bestows value and blessing on those whom society would toss aside, who highlights the ones in the shadows, who looks at a person's heart instead of their status. This is the God who looks like Jesus, even in Genesis.

Image of the patriarchs from pinterest.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Names of God

The Hebrew word "YHWH" (read from right to left) This past Sunday I gave a talk on the Names of God, the beginning of a series on this topic. This first talk was to be a gentle introduction so I thought it wouldn't take too many hours of preparation. Well, I quickly discovered that the research is almost bottomless; every time I thought I had a somewhat definitive list of names, I found another source which added a few more or gave a different twist on some of the names I had already come across. After several hours I was getting overwhelmed by the sheer amount of data (and that was only looking at the Hebrew Bible). I wondered how I could present this to people in an orderly and accessible fashion and within a reasonable time frame. Not everyone is up for a 3-hour lecture crammed full of detail on a Sunday morning. So I took a break and spent a bit of time meditating on this problem and asking the Spirit for guidance. And then I thought that being overwhelmed by Go

it's a mad mad mad world (of theology)

The mad dash for the end of term has begun.  I have finished all my required readings and have jumped into research reading.  One of my papers is on the madness of theology (the correlation seems more obvious to some of us than to others).  Truly inspiring stuff, I am finding.  Let me share a few quotes here: There is a certain madness in Christianity – in a desert God who is jealous and passionate, in a saviour who speaks in apocalyptic terms, in a life of sacrificial love, in the scandal of particularity.   In principle, a confessional theology should bear the mark of this madness, but the mark or wound must constantly be renewed. - Walter Lowe, "Postmodern Theology" in The Oxford Handbook of Systematic Theology , 2007.   “In the Scriptures the odd phenomena constituting the ‘Kingdom of God’ are the offspring of the shock that is delivered by the name of God to what is there called the ‘world,’ resulting in what I call a ‘sacred anarchy.’   Consider but a sampling o

comedic timing

Comic by Joel Micah Harris at xkcd.com One of my favourite jokes goes like this: Knock, knock. Who's there? Interrupting cow Interrupting cow w--- Moooooooo!! Timing is important in both drama and comedy. A well-paced story draws the audience in and helps it invest in the characters, while a tale too hastily told or too long drawn out will fail to engage anyone. Surprise - something which interrupts the expected - is a creative use of timing and integral to any good story. If someone is reading a novel and everything unfolds in a predictable manner, they will probably wonder why they bothered reading the book. And so it is in life. Having life be predictable all of the time is not as calming as it sounds. We love surprises, especially good surprises like birthday parties, gifts, marriage proposals, and finding something that we thought was lost. Surprises are an important part of humour. A good joke is funny because it goes to a place you didn't expect it to go. Sim